Next book

THE EURASIAN CENTURY

HOT WARS, COLD WARS, AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD

Thoughtful and disturbing.

World history since 1900, with an emphasis on geopolitics.

Brands, Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict With China, reminds readers that Eurasia, Earth’s largest landmass, remains the world’s strategic center. When the modern age began, its powerhouse was Western Europe—until the post–World War II recovery of Japan and breathtaking rise of China pulled the economic center of gravity east. The first of Brands’ five long chapters introduces Sir Halford Mackinder (1861-1947), an obscure British civil servant who excelled in explaining geopolitics, a discipline focused on the relationship between land and political power. Mackinder emphasized that maritime nations like his own could pursue positive-sum strategies in trade and cooperation, whereas continental powers existed in cramped, cutthroat conditions where the surest route to safety was to conquer your neighbors. What follows illustrates this unsettling theme. World War I was so searing that no democratic statesman wished to repeat it, but it left many potential troublemakers. The big winner, the United States, acted as though geography guaranteed its security, although it did not. Learning from its mistakes, after 1945 “the United States pursued a generous, positive-sum vision of cooperation” and oversaw 80 years of peace and unrivaled prosperity. Sadly, peace and prosperity aren’t a priority among autocrats. “They want glory, greatness, and empire.…By late 2023, both Eastern Europe and the Middle East were ablaze,” and few doubt the possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Today, a return to history’s horrors is all too plausible. Americans need to learn the lessons of the first Eurasian century if they are to survive the second. A fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, Brands delivers a worshipful portrait of President Reagan but approves of liberal democracy as opposed to “would-be authoritarian” Trump, making a convincing case that democracy is in trouble.

Thoughtful and disturbing.

Pub Date: Jan. 14, 2025

ISBN: 9781324036944

Page Count: 336

Publisher: Norton

Review Posted Online: Oct. 12, 2024

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2024

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 15


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 15


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview