ORIGINAL SIN

Why so few spoke up.

This tough yet fair account of an aging president’s inauspicious reelection campaign makes a strong case that voters deserve to know more about their commander-in-chief’s health. Joe Biden won in 2020 pledging to serve as “a bridge” to the next generation of Democrats, but his second-term bid, which promulgated “the lie” that he wasn’t experiencing “cognitive diminishment,” became “a charade that delivered the election” to Donald Trump. So say Tapper, a CNN anchor, and Thompson, an Axios political reporter. Their robust reporting—they interviewed about 200 people in and around the campaign—reveals that Biden showed worrying signs of age-related memory loss in 2019 and that, according to an unnamed insider, he was not always the sole boss during his presidency: “Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.” First Lady Jill Biden and a small group of Biden loyalists were among “the chief deniers of his deterioration.” His staffers shut down intraparty discussions about his fitness for four more years; scheduled far fewer interviews and press conferences than his recent predecessors; questioned the professionalism of reporters working on news stories about Biden’s memory struggles; and regularly withheld “bad news” from the president, even declining to show him polling that suggested he was losing to Trump. Why? Because “politics is addictive,” according to one prominent Democrat. Meanwhile, “no one wanted to be on the outside in case he did win,” said a party donor. The authors suggest that Congress should consider legislation requiring a doctor for sitting presidents to swear to give detailed medical reports. As one physician tells the authors, “the yearly letter from the president’s doctor is basically a tradition,” not a legal requirement.

An authoritative indictment of a denial-plagued presidential run.